Why did Sobchak run for president? Ksenia Sobchak announced her candidacy for the post of President of Russia. How Sobchak went from TV star to politician
It has happened: rumors that Ksenia Sobchak was going to stand as a candidate in the 2018 presidential elections have been confirmed. The plans of the 35-year-old TV presenter led to an immediate reaction from society. For example, a number of experts expressed the opinion that Sobchak in this regard turned out to be a “convenient oppositionist”, having coordinated her nomination with the Kremlin, which, in turn, could lead to a high turnout in the upcoming elections.
Writing for a Better Audience
Ksenia Sobchak announced her intentions by sending a letter with the corresponding content to the editors of Vedomosti, whose readers she considers “the best audience in the country.” “Over the five years that have passed since the protest wave of 2012, my political views have finally formed, and I am ready to declare them and defend them at any, the highest level,” Sobchak states in the first paragraph of his message. “I am a candidate “against everyone”” - Sobchak positions himself with this slogan.
In a detailed letter, the TV presenter talks about the main points of her program, which experts have already designated as right-wing liberal. For example, Sobchak talks about the abolition of bans on the manifestation of political will and initiative, the distribution of funds in favor of the regions, the privatization of large state corporations, the development of private business, judicial and educational reforms, and so on.
The TV presenter will talk about how the campaign for collecting signatures and organizing the election headquarters will take place during a press conference scheduled for October 24, as Ksenia Chudinova, spokeswoman for Sobchak’s election campaign, said in a conversation with RBC.
The Kremlin's reaction
As for that very “coordination with the Kremlin and President Putin,” there was none. At least that’s what presidential press secretary Dmitry Peskov says. His words, one way or another, are confirmed by Sobchak herself, who on the air of Dozhd said that she had already informed the head of state that she would take part in the elections. “Putin said that everyone has the right to make decisions and should be responsible for them,” she said, noting that Putin did not seem pleased with what she heard.
The Kremlin official also noted that there are no obstacles to Sobchak becoming a presidential candidate, since she is “a citizen of the Russian Federation who, in accordance with the Constitution, can run for president of the country.” Peskov also noted that the TV presenter is a versatile and talented person in many areas, but in politics, which is different from journalism and show business, she will have to “gain experience from scratch.”
Zhirinovsky, Khakamada and Zyuganov
In political circles, Sobchak’s plans were received without enthusiasm. Thus, Vladimir Zhirinovsky made a statement that this step could be dangerous, since Russia should be ruled by a marshal, “but a sergeant is going to the polls.” “A dummy candidate to put down other candidates,” says the leader of the LDPR.
Another politician, Irina Khakamada, in a conversation with RIA Novosti, said that Ksenia Sobchak’s participation in the campaign resembles a provocative farce, even though she can attract a large number of young people to participate in the elections. In general, Khakamada is “normal” about these plans, and there is no need to worry about this, since no one hopes that the TV presenter will be president. “If she were an experienced politician, this would be a different story...” summed up the publicist and business consultant.
Ksenia Sobchak herself positions herself as an opposition candidate to the Kremlin. However, Russia's notional "liberal opposition" is unhappy with her decision to run. And the conventionally oppositional Russian media were very critical of her step.
It is also difficult to believe Sobchak because she has denied several times that she is going to run for president. “Rumors about my nomination are a provocation and another attempt to discredit,” she said at the end of September.
Who is Sobchak
Socialite, journalist-TV presenter and daughter of Putin's godfather - all this is about Ksenia Sobchak. She is an ambiguous personality, and accordingly, her step caused mixed reactions.
Some people know her better as the host of the reality show "Dom-2", while others remember her for her ironic and witty interviews on the Dozhd TV channel. She characterized the annexation of Crimea as a “brilliantly executed political combination” and as “hemorrhoids for the next hundred years.”
She angered many Ukrainians with her appeal to Poroshenko, in which she sharply criticized his decision to block Vkontakte, Odnoklassniki and Yandex. However, many remember her compliments to the Ukrainians during the Euromaidan, in particular, the words that “in terms of civic consciousness, you are our older brother.” Her joint report with journalist Anton Krasovsky was published by the website Snob.ru.
Ksenia Sobchak in February 2014 in the premises of the Kyiv City State Administration. Photo: Vladimir Shuvaev
In 2016, she said that Ukraine is much more successful than Russia in terms of political prospects and is going through a process of “painful recovery.” Even when Avakov splashes water on Saakashvili, this is a sign that an ugly but political struggle is going on. At the same time, Sobchak has repeatedly said that she opposes revolutions. Because, according to her, Putin is better than chaos.
Candidate "against everyone"
Ksenia Sobchak announced her decision to run for president in a letter published on October 18 on the website of the Vedomosti newspaper. The address, as Meduza sarcastically noted, is replete with spelling errors.
Sobchak positions himself as a candidate “against everyone.” There is no such column in Russian ballots and she believes that this is bad. “Ksenia Sobchak in your ballot is the “Against all” column. You get a legal and peaceful opportunity to say: “Enough! Enough!" she writes.
She also promised to withdraw her candidacy if Alexei Navalny was allowed to participate in the elections. The Russian authorities are blocking the latter from being nominated until at least 2028 due to his criminal record. However, Navalny himself criticized Sobchak’s decision. Even before she officially announced her decision, he called her a “caricatured liberal candidate” who is wanted by the oligarchs or the Kremlin.
Sobchak herself has already stated that she discussed her participation in the elections with Putin, and he allegedly did not look happy. She also denies that she coordinated her decision with the Russian presidential administration. But the Russian media don't believe her. “Sobchak’s initiative could not have been agreed upon with the Kremlin,” RBC wrote based on the results of a survey of experts.
If the Russian authorities are afraid of Navalny, then Sobchak certainly cannot pose a threat to Putin. A Levada Center poll shows that she is one of the five politicians whom Russians do not trust. And in general, 55% of Russians are not ready to see a woman as president.
However, Sobchak can play the role of an “alternative” in the eyes of Western observers. They say that not only the traditional Putin, Zhirinovsky and Zyuganov are taking part in the elections, but also a young, promising opposition-minded journalist.
Ksenia Sobchak announced that she will take part in the Russian presidential elections next spring. “Blonde in Chocolate” called herself an “Against Everyone” candidate and expressed her determination to withdraw her candidacy in favor of Navalny if he is allowed to participate in the elections. However, Ella Pamfilova, as if by agreement with our heroine, has already stated that the 41-year-old chairman of the Progress Party cannot be registered as a candidate due to a criminal record and will easily be able to take part in the presidential elections after 2028.
"Cartoon Candidate"
Back in September, information leaked to the press about Ksenia Sobchak’s possible participation in the presidential elections with the approval of the presidential administration. However, the person involved in the rumors herself dubbed these data an attempt to discredit her. At the same time, she did not announce her refusal to run for office. Then Alexei Navalny, who had previously, as if nothing had happened, participated with her in various opposition rallies, hastened to expose these rumors to unprecedented criticism.
The most famous political blogger called Sobchak Jr. a caricature of a liberal candidate and a “spoiler” with the cannibalistic views of a democrat of the early nineties. The former participant in the sensational project “Dom-2” did not keep her waiting and on Instagram accused the most effective opposition leader of leaderism, hypocrisy, calls for uncoordinated actions and a split in the opposition. At the same time, however, she cunningly suggested “joining efforts.”
Rumors about the participation of the 35-year-old daughter of former boss Vladimir Putin in the presidential race ceased to be such after the publication on October 18 in the Vedomosti newspaper of a unique program of a candidate for the first post in the state.
The TV personality explained her decision by her desire to return the “forbidden” column “Against all” to the ballot papers. “Are you against the fact that for many years only Zyuganov, Yavlinsky, Putin and their faceless backups and deputies are on the list? Do you want to show your active position, but your candidate is not allowed to participate in the elections? Don't have your own candidate? Tag Sobchak. You don't elect her for president. You simply have a legal and peaceful opportunity to say: “Enough! Got it!” wrote the host of the program named after herself “Sobchak Live.”
The new wife of the famous actor Maxim Vitorgan finds it a wrong decision to boycott the presidential campaign due to the refusal to register “prominent opposition figures and, of course, first of all Alexei Navalny” as candidates.
In the unusual role of a presidential candidate, she plans to talk about how bad things are in the Vast and that the “system” needs to be changed. Also, the host of the radio program “Barabaka and the Gray Wolf” intends to demand “the release of all political prisoners” and the registration of Alexei Navalny as a candidate in the presidential elections.
According to media data, Ksenia Sobchak’s consultants during the election campaign will be the well-known political strategist Vitaly Shklyarov, as well as the co-owner of the Vedomosti newspaper, who was recently deprived of Russian citizenship, Demyan Kudryavtsev. By the way, Mr. Shklyarov somehow advised Democratic senator and “non-practicing Jew” Bernie Sanders in the US presidential elections, although he refused to participate in the presidential race at the primaries stage.
It is curious that the star of glamorous domestic journalism informed President Putin about her nomination in advance during an interview for the filming of a documentary about her father Anatoly Sobchak. In response, the administration of the head of state supported this candidacy and spoke about the “full constitutionality” of her self-nomination.
According to an October poll by the Levada Center, in the upcoming elections, 64% of the plebiscite votes should go to the current leader of Russia since the end of 1999. According to sociologists, the Kremlin is currently concerned not with Vladimir Putin's victory, but with the turnout for the elections. The fact is that turnout in the State Duma elections in 2016 and in the September regional elections demonstrated a noticeable decline in Russians’ interest in this “sacred duty of citizens.”
Let us remind you that Sobchak is not the first woman to seek the highest government position. In the elections in 2000, Ella Pamfilova nominated her candidacy, and in 2004, Irina Khakamada.
President Sobchak through the eyes of politicians
“I think that if she has any views on politics, she will have to gain experience from scratch. Politics is different from journalism and show business; it is a completely different substance. Politics presupposes the expression of the will of the people. If Ksyusha is able to respond to this expression of the will of the people, she will have a chance in politics,” press secretary of the head of state Dmitry Peskov told the Dozhd TV channel. It is interesting that his comment came out a few minutes before the Vedomosti newspaper published Sobchak’s “pre-election” letter, in which she first announced her “presidential ambitions.”
Of course, Russia's long-living political leader, the leader of the LDPR, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, did not stand aside. “Of course, you can run for office, but it’s clear that you must have a certain set of qualities, you must have some kind of historical era behind you... You need to work in different jobs, you need to be in the elections. What elections was she in? No one has ever voted for her,” said a participant in all presidential elections since 1991 at the 19th World Festival of Youth and Students in Sochi.
His permanent opponent and leader of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation greeted the news about Sobchak with a call not to turn the election campaign into a laughing stock and tragicomedy (RIA Novosti). He said that in his new book, “The Countdown Has Started,” he quotes the statements of “the most evil Russophobes,” and among them is “Ksyusha, who called Russia and its people genetic scum.” In this connection, the famous communist believes, with such an assessment of the country and its citizens, it is wrong to nominate oneself for such an important post: “this is impossible even in Burkina Faso.”
The founder of Open Russia, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, wrote on Twitter that “there is something” in Sobchak’s nomination. “She can really help people understand the essence of “elections without choice,” the ex-oligarch believes.
Presidential candidate in the 2004 elections, Irina Khakamada, in an interview with Dozhd, called the idea of nominating Ksenia Sobchak “interesting, a joke.” The politician believes that its result can demonstrate to the Kremlin that people are “fed up”, and the authorities will understand that they need to “either change, or they will be swept away.”
In turn, Leonid Gozman on “Echo of Moscow” expressed suspicion that against the backdrop of Sobchak, everyone except Putin will look like “clowns and/or old men who have fallen into insanity,” and the main candidate will be completely legally “on horseback.”
There has been no reaction from Alexei Navalny yet.
“Beer is better than Sobchak”
The declaration of Ksenia Sobchak's intention to participate in the presidential race caused a storm of all kinds of assessments and comments from political scientists on the most popular social network.
For example, the famous political consultant Konstantin Kalachev wrote the following on Facebook: “Sobchak says that this is for her - against everyone. But in 1995, I also said that for the party of beer lovers it was “against everyone.” Got less than one percent. But beer is better than Sobchak.”
“There is only one mystery in Sobchak’s nomination: how was Putin persuaded to do this?” asks Kalachev.
“The presidential administration could not help but understand that Sobchak would leak the story on Channel One,” political analyst Abbas Gallyamov wrote on his FB page. – Since the Kremlin-controlled First Channel is reporting Sobchak’s participation in the upcoming elections, this leaves no doubt that the authorities, in principle, are not against her participation in the elections. At least for the “suspicious” opposition voter, the Kremlin’s friendly attitude will become obvious.”
According to Gallyamov, this is also a serious argument in support of Navalny’s position. “By disregarding the rules of camouflage, the authorities thereby set priorities,” the political scientist believes. “What a liberal voter thinks is not so important for them compared to what a mass voter, a mass voter, will think after learning about Sobchak’s nomination.”
In turn, political scientist Evgeny Minchenko noted that “if Vitaly Shklyarov is involved in Sobchak’s company, then this is not bad for her.” “The head of the campaign of American Democrat Bernie Sanders praised Vitaly,” Minchenko writes on Facebook. “Well, Shklyarov’s participation will be an additional argument in favor of the fact that Ksenia is not a Kremlin project.”
Ksenia Sobchak as a presidential candidate is not funny, convinces Evgeniy Minchenko: “for a new girl” you can get up to 10 percent with a competent campaign and good funding.”
Another political analyst Andrei Okara wrote on the most influential social network today that “Sobchak’s participation in the presidential race legitimizes the elections, relieves tension along the Putin-Navalny line, creates maximum comfort for the current president, reduces the likelihood of the election campaign moving from an inertial format to a mobilization and almost rules out catastrophic.”
Political scientist Okara thinks that “with his participation, Sobchak will save the legitimacy of the re-election of his seemingly godfather and that this will be a completely competitive struggle with the most white-tape opposition.” The expert also added that “apparently her own big show will soon appear on one of the federal television channels.”
Political scientist Valery Solovey believes in Sobchak’s success. On his personal Facebook page, he wrote: “Ksenia Sobchak can perform unexpectedly successfully in the presidential elections,” adding: “provided that Alexei Navalny and a well-structured company are absent from the elections.”
I would like to immediately propose a small but important amendment. The word “Art” in the above title is deeply inappropriate. The project of promoting a 35-year-old outrageous show business figure to the top leader of the second nuclear power in the world has absolutely nothing to do with art. But he has the most direct relation to high politics. And we are not talking about “politics” in the form of small-town games in the opposition “sandbox,” but about quite serious politics. The slogan “Ksyusha for President!” is deeply absurd at first glance. fits equally perfectly into the plans of the Kremlin and into the expectations of Ksenia Anatolyevna herself.
I would like to immediately reassure those overly nervous citizens who, under the influence of Donald Trump’s victory in the US presidential election last year, cannot banish from the depths of their consciousness the idea that the unthinkable could happen in Russia. Can not. There will never be President Ksenia Sobchak in Russia under any circumstances. This is well understood by all rational thinking people, among whom I include Ksenia Anatolyevna herself without any discounts. Yes Yes exactly. Ksenia Sobchak is not at all a “painted doll”, as some ill-wishers think of her. Ksenia Sobchak is quite a mature, experienced and subtle political player who understands perfectly well what exactly is required of her and exactly what role she has to play.
“The main thing is not victory, but participation” - perhaps I do not have a true sports spirit in me, but I have always considered this famous saying of the founder of the modern Olympic movement, Baron Pierre de Coubertin, as a consolation for losers, those who took part, but were left with nothing. But for Russian presidential candidate Ksenia Sobchak in the 2018 elections, these words are a real guide to action. As I said above, no one expects victory from Ksenia Anatolyevna. But the Kremlin expects her to participate in the election campaign - participation not for form, but genuine, fierce, without discounts or sentimentality, participation in the style of “Sobchak in all his glory.”
The presence of such a desire in the Kremlin may seem strange. Usually, in the presidential elections of the Russian Federation, Putin’s sparring partners are “exceptionally dangerous competitors” like the eternal Gennady Andreevich Zyuganov or the former security guard Zhirinovsky (there was such a presidential candidate Oleg Malyshkin in the 2004 elections, in case anyone has forgotten). But those around Putin are well aware that in the 2018 elections such a familiar political move – or, to put it more precisely, such a habitual lack of a political move – will not work. It is important for the Kremlin that Putin not only wins the elections, but that “simply winning” the elections is already assured. It is important for the Kremlin that Putin wins clearly and convincingly.
And this, in the current political circumstances, requires, in turn, two conditions. Condition A: Putin needs a bright and convincing opponent from that Russian political camp that can conditionally and for lack of a better term be called liberal. Condition B: the name of this “bright and convincing opponent” should not sound like “Navalny”. Of course, one should not conclude from this that if Navalny had been allowed to participate in the elections, he would have had a real chance of defeating Putin. Candidate Navalny would undoubtedly get more votes than candidate Sobchak will get. But the final result of the elections would not have changed. Only the place of Alexei Navalny in Russian politics would change. From a person on probation, as he officially is now, Navalny would turn into a figure who would force the Kremlin to dance to its tune.
The essence of the current strategy of the authorities in relation to Alexei Navalny is very simple: they are trying to drive him back into the environment of the political fringes. Navalny will be able to escape from this trap only if he receives the right to become an official presidential candidate. But the theoretical possibility of granting him such a right would mean a complete loss of face for the authorities. Navalny is a suspended sentence and this, according to the letter of the law, deprives him of the right to run for office. Navalny sees his task as scaring the authorities to death and forcing them to make an exception for him. However, the authorities are not going to be afraid. She is going to neutralize Navalny’s strategy by selecting for Putin both a completely comfortable and completely convincing competitor from the liberal camp. A suitable candidate for the role of such a competitor is Ksenia Sobchak.
I am very far from the world of glamor and social gatherings, and I am very happy about it. I can judge Ksenia Sobchak only from the outside - from the position of a person who has never communicated with her personally in his life. But these are the conclusions I have long come to regarding her. Ksenia Sobchak has a lot of qualities that are not attractive in my eyes. For example, I was always amazed by her incomprehensible readiness to get into other people’s personal lives and throw around peremptory and even offensive judgments. But at the same time, Ksenia Sobchak is a brilliant polemicist, a person who really knows a lot about politics and history, a person who is not afraid to touch on topics that others would not even take a shot at. Ksenia Sobchak is anyone, but not a dummy.
This combination of negative and positive qualities - a “bouquet” of undoubted talent and “toxicity” in the eyes of a significant part of society - makes Sobchak a very convenient sparring partner for Putin. How can Ksenia Anatolyevna herself benefit from this role? The answer lies on the surface. Participation in the presidential elections will further increase the “capitalization” of Ksenia Sobchak as a socially significant figure and show business figure. Of course, in the eyes of Navalny and his supporters, she will turn (or has already turned) into a traitor - see the emotional speech of London exile Evgeny Chichvarkin with sending Ksenia Antolyevna to places where ordinary polite people do not send. But I suspect that Ksenia Sobchak, who is not at all prone to reflection, will somehow survive this. Political show business requires sacrifices.
Delete
-
((fb))
-
Material added to “Favorites”
Remove material from Favorites?
Delete
Material removed from Favorites
Marina Lystseva / TASS
Ksenia Sobchak will participate in the Russian presidential elections in 2018. This is stated in her letter, which the TV presenter sent to the editors of Vedomosti. Earlier, Vedomosti, citing several sources, reported that a woman could take part in next year’s elections. A source close to the presidential administration called Sobchak “the ideal candidate.”
According to Sobchak, she was not given the opportunity to properly comment on the publication where her last name was mentioned. “Now my position on this issue has been formed, and I would like to express it in a letter on the Vedomosti website. It seems to me that this will be consistent for the publication, and it is an honor for me to address the best audience in the country,” Sobchak wrote.
Vedomosti publishes the full version of Ksenia Sobchak’s letter (in the author’s edition).
Decision is made
Stop being silent. I've been thinking about this for several months now. And not because that’s how women are built – they try everything on themselves, but because that’s how I’m built – I perceive all opportunities as a challenge. Over the five years that have passed since the protest wave of 2012, my political views have finally formed, and I am ready to declare them and defend them at any, the highest level.
I am Ksenia Sobchak, I am 35 years old, I have lived and worked in Russia all my life, and I care what my country will become. I take responsibility for any actions in the public sphere, and, realizing all the risks and incredible difficulties of such a task, I decided that my participation in the presidential elections could really be a step towards the transformations that our country needs so much. Despite the attempts of officials to discredit me and use me for their own purposes, despite the attacks of some of my liberal friends, despite the speculations of armchair political scientists, my nomination can and should become useful for both the opposition and the entire society. I will obviously have to explain my position many times in the near future, so I want to present my main arguments right away.
What to do?
Probably, these elections as a whole are not the best choice; in them, the competition for the main candidate consists of those who have long been an eyesore for voters, unable or unwilling to change anything, and those who want changes will apparently not be able to take part in them and perhaps they can achieve it. These are not the kinds of choices we see in our aspirations for the future. But only we ourselves can fix this. Each of us can and must declare our position, our disagreement with the government, which wants a quarter-century of irremovability, disagreement with collapsing education and healthcare, with the monstrous corruption and propaganda that has permeated the entire society - from rural schools to the Kremlin, with the widespread dominance of the security forces, with war, with international isolation.
For this conversation, we must use all opportunities - communication at home and at work, discussions on social networks, rallies and elections at all levels. Social changes will not happen without the majority recognizing their need. And yes, I repeat, we must use these elections both to publicly discuss the shortcomings of our government and to improve the skills of our opposition. We must not ignore elections as an institution, as the main instrument of public representation - the basis of real democracy, even despite the fact that, in fact, over the past decades it has never been used as it should be, because truly free elections are not only fair voting, but free and equal access to participation and campaigning, accurate counting and results accepted by society. The March elections won't be like that either. They didn't anymore. But should we ignore them, boycott them? No. We must prepare to participate in them and change them with our participation, collect signatures, demand registration, and vote. This is exactly how the brightest and most consistent representatives of the opposition are already acting. In order to win a marathon, you need to train, participate, and demand fair judging.
Elections of municipal deputies have just taken place in Moscow. In some areas, the opposition noticeably squeezed out the party in power, and in others it completely won. Probably, if the turnout had been higher, the opposition's results would have been even higher. All the major opposition forces called on Muscovites to go to the polls, despite the complete information blockade by the authorities. Did these forces, or rather, did we, Muscovites, expect that these elections would be fair? No! But we hoped to make them like this. The best of us - by our participation. The rest - by their arrival.
Would you say that presidential elections are structured differently? That, given a predetermined result, the authorities are interested in increasing turnout, in creating the appearance of legitimacy? And I ask you - what difference does it make what the authorities are interested in? What matters is what we want. It is precisely in contrast to the authorities that we must be consistent in our beliefs and actions: elections are the most important institution of democracy, and we must use any political and social occasion to discuss the situation in which society finds itself and demonstrate our disagreement.
Is boycotting elections, non-participation in them in the event of refusal to register as candidates by prominent opposition figures and, of course, first of all Alexei Navalny, the right way to demonstrate one’s disagreement? In my opinion, no. Non-participation in elections, the silence of the dissatisfied during such a boycott is mixed with the indifferent silence of the lazy; it does not allow us and the entire society to see the real number of dissenters who want renewal and change. Having refused a legal and safe, but such a significant manifestation of our will as participation, albeit in controlled, imperfect, even dishonest elections, we leave ourselves no choice other than street confrontation, which, obviously, is not suitable for everyone and which, of course, must to be an extreme and exceptional measure of political struggle. Recent history knows many cases when elections and plebiscites supposedly controlled by authoritarian authorities turned into occasions and tools for genuine democratic changes. This always happened when the opposition participated in the elections, and never when it silently did not participate.
In the even more dramatic days of October 1993, a legal method of “active boycott” of elections appeared in Russia, which is what some of our opposition is calling for - a presidential decree was adopted on the introduction of the “Against all” column in elections at all levels in Russia.
This is a legal and completely peaceful instrument for expressing civil dissatisfaction with the election procedure, the composition of participants, and the irremovability of power. Many years ago, the government, which treats electoral legislation as a drawbar depending on its tactical needs, deprived us of this tool. By participating in the March presidential elections, I want to return it. Ksenia Sobchak in your ballot is the “Against all” column. Are you against the fact that for many years only Zyuganov, Yavlinsky, Putin and their faceless backups and deputies are on the list? Do you want to show your active position, but your candidate is not allowed to participate in the elections? Don't have your own candidate? Tag Sobchak. You don't elect her for president. You simply have a legal and peaceful opportunity to say: “Enough! Got it!”
How to do?
Elections are not just about voting. This is propaganda. This is a legalized right of access to political media, which the rest of the time is completely usurped by the authorities and the sycophants close to them. Election campaigning is not the only, but a very important way to tell people who do not subscribe to the Dozhd TV channel or do not use YouTube about corruption and the inefficiency of today’s government. If such a method is available to us, we should use it.
I am going to the elections not just as a candidate, but as a mouthpiece for all those who cannot become a candidate, I am ready to voice complaints about the existing system, of which there are many in all parts of the political spectrum, I am ready to broadcast messages from both the left and the right, because the problem corruption, the problem of uncontrollability and irremovability of power is greater than our ideological differences. Today it is impossible to normally discuss solutions to all our problems within the framework of elections, because not all political forces are on an equal footing, but this means that we must talk more actively and loudly about the problems themselves. Today it is necessary to forget for a while about our differences and again remember the commonality of our views and tell others that political competition is normal. It is not necessary to elect people you don’t know as governors. That power should serve you, and not enrich itself at your expense. Elections are a tool for political education. And it will definitely bear fruit. Maybe not this March. But much faster than our opponents think.
I invite all political forces who are ready to use my nomination as a platform to present their claims to the current situation and power within the framework of my campaign, because this is not a campaign for Sobchak, it is a campaign against the way our political and social life is structured today. Sobchak’s campaign is not just “Against all of them” campaigning, it is, I hope, a lot of work explaining why we are “against all of these.”
Why me?
Unlike the eternal candidates who have to explain why they deserve to be president of the Russian Federation, my task is simple - I must explain why I am suitable for the role of the “Against All” candidate.
I am outside of strict ideological frameworks. I do not belong to specific parties, I am not bound by party or group discipline, within the framework of this campaign I am not even for “Our Crimea” or against it. I am for total theft to stop in the country, for real politics and power to appear, accountable to the free will of people who will decide for themselves how to live, and on equal terms with the entire world community and neighbors will decide whose Crimea really is.
None of the candidates of the so-called systemic opposition fell under the repressive machine of power. None of them were detained, searches were not carried out, nothing was seized, nothing was confiscated. They all live on one form or another of government funding and sponsorship, which is completely safe for donors and recipients. They go to the polls because they don’t know how to do anything else, including how to make money in anything else. I know what I'm risking and have proven my willingness to take those risks. I have a lot to do, but I put everything aside to do what I think is necessary (and possible) in this political moment.
I am against the revolution. But I am a good mediator and organizer. Alexey Navalny offered the current leadership a peaceful departure - this is correct, this is very important for consolidating the procedure for the succession of power in the country. But they won't believe him. And they will believe me. I can talk to everyone - both because I personally know most of the Russian establishment, and because I am a journalist whose profession is to talk to everyone.
Almost 500 difficult professions in Russia are officially closed to women. But among everyone else, a woman’s salary is almost 30% less than a man’s. Among the countries' most important companies, only about 5% are headed by women. This problem exists everywhere, but Russia is not even close to developed countries in solving it, despite public declarations of gender equality. I am a woman. I don’t have that terrible male ego that always prevents politicians from reaching an agreement, that considers a forceful solution to any problem to be the most correct, but this is almost always not the case. Whatever the outcome, half the country's population deserves to have a woman's voice heard in these supposedly men's games for the first time in 14 years.
I am famous and even popular, even if not as a politician, but if elections provide a platform, then it is necessary that the person behind it be heard. It is important that the person who got caught for her is not afraid to speak and knows how to do it.
I am wealthy, but all my income is the result of hard work that is visible to everyone, I do not own privatized enterprises, I do not receive commissions or kickbacks, I pay taxes in full and I am proud of my autonomy and independence. I will be able to raise money for my campaign - and this is also very important, because I probably will not have time to collect it on a penny from a million low-income people, I hope to collect it from among the elite - and this will show that all layers society is unhappy with what is happening. It seems to me that it is important for us to understand that we are all in the same boat - young and old, famous and unknown, rich and sick. And it’s not us who are “rocking” it, our boat is skewed by political imbalance, by the mistakes of the authorities, by their illiteracy and theft, but together we can fix it.
Perhaps I am too romantic - but we have enough cynic politicians, at the same time, I, Ksenia Sobchak, am reasonable enough to understand: the authorities will want to use my nomination as legitimation of these elections, and not through an increase in turnout, which the authorities, in my opinion , there is no need, on the contrary, everyone who does not come to the elections only facilitates falsification and makes the share of the conservative, unenlightened and deceived majority even higher, by allowing me to participate in the elections, the authorities will want to show the supposedly existing “full representation of the political spectrum.” As if my presence on the ballot solves the problem of excluding other candidates. But I am the “Against All” candidate, I refuse to play someone else’s role, to take someone else’s place. Therefore, from the very beginning I say what I will do in these elections: I will tell how bad things are in the country, I will say that the system needs to be changed, I will demand and am already demanding the release of Alexei Navalny and his registration as a candidate for the presidential elections , the release of all political prisoners. (Here it is important to emphasize that this also applies to representatives of the “systemic” opposition: I personally am against even the very unlikely victory of Grigory Yavlinsky in the presidential elections, but I believe that his exclusion as a candidate in the last presidential elections is a shame.) If other representatives of the liberal the opposition, including - and first of all - Alexei Navalny, will be registered to participate in the elections, I am ready to coordinate my efforts with them, right up to the withdrawal of my candidacy. If, under these conditions, Russian citizens support my self-nomination and I am registered as a candidate, then I will continue to consistently defend this position. And, in my opinion, this is useful for the political climate in the country. If after such statements I am not registered, this is also useful. This brings even greater clarity, further exposing the hypocrisy of the system.
I know that I am a controversial figure. I am a journalist, a chocolate blonde, the daughter of a reformer, a member of the coordinating council of the Russian opposition - I may not be your candidate - but my participation in the elections in the positions described above is beneficial to voters, useful for the Russian political system.
Not only against
Despite the fact that I see my role in these elections as a mouthpiece of claims, as a candidate “Against all”, which means that my own views are not so fundamental for the campaign, because for me it is really more important to achieve free representation of all views and platforms in the future Russian authorities, I still believe that I need to publicly formulate my basic principles and beliefs; I don’t need to agree with them, but I think it’s worth knowing them when deciding whether to support or not support my participation in this election campaign. These are the principles.
Russia is a European country. Its equal partners and allies are European powers, democratic and prosperous countries. Pan-European values are a priority not only for the country’s foreign but also for its domestic policy.
Russia is a democratic country. All laws that prohibit or make it difficult for citizens to demonstrate political will and initiative must be revised. All political and non-violent actions of a citizen related to the implementation of his constitutional rights to freedom of speech, assembly and others must be permitted. Article 282 of the Criminal Code must be repealed. The highest form of expression of the people's will is a referendum; existing restrictions on the forms and timing of regional and federal referendums should be abolished.
Russia is a democratic federal state. It must actually ensure the division of powers into branches and territories. The powers of the branches of government must be legally limited, and the rights of public and political representation of minorities must be protected in law and in practice. The distribution of funds between the regions and the federal center should be changed in favor of the regions. It is necessary to return competitive elections to all levels of regional and federal government; the president should not have the right to appoint governors and dismiss them. The rights of security forces must be limited in law and in practice. Their financing must be transparent and fully accountable to parliament and the Accounts Chamber.
Russia is a country of a free economy with a strong social sector. All large state corporations should be privatized with antimonopoly restrictions. The state should not control any sectors of the economy; the state’s share in enterprises and industries should be limited to blocking packages. Private property must be protected by law; revision of any ownership and nationalization are possible only on a compensation basis based on independent market assessments.
Reform of tax and regulatory legislation and practices should stimulate the development of private entrepreneurship, small and medium-sized businesses, technological and innovative development of enterprises, and education. The list of licensed sectors of the economy should be significantly reduced.
The state must stop owning propaganda tools. State ownership of the media should be legally limited on both industry and regional grounds. Private ownership of media outlets should be subject to strict antitrust restrictions. Other restrictions on the ownership and operation of media outlets should be lifted. Telecom operators should be freed from regulatory functions and administrative and financial burdens associated with monitoring the freedom of speech and private life of citizens. The laws known as the “Yarovaya package” must be repealed.
There must be judicial reform that truly ensures the independence of the judiciary. Regions should have the right to their own legislative practices that do not come into direct conflict with the federal Constitution. The superiority of the international treaties signed by Russia, the primacy of the basic provisions of international law in the field of protection of individual rights and property rights must be restored.
A reform of the education system must be carried out, providing strong government support for promising industries and freedom for private and commercial educational institutions.
In practice, censorship and the ability of the state to manage cultural and public institutions with financial and administrative instruments must be eliminated. State support for culture and non-profit organizations should be carried out through professional public councils, based on strict rules and constant personal rotation of their composition.
Russia is a secular state. Religious institutions and figures cannot be financed from the state budget, from the budget of state enterprises and enterprises associated with state orders. Laws that distinguish representatives of one or another confession into a special social group must be repealed.
Russia is a democratic country. All laws that restrict the rights of people based on gender or sexual orientation must be repealed. All restrictions imposed on Russian citizens based on their place of birth, the presence of other citizenships, past criminal records, and so on, with the exception of cases of national security, must be abolished. The adoption of Russian citizens by foreign citizens should be allowed in all cases where citizens of the Russian Federation do not claim custody of the child.
What's next?
I will devote the coming time to the formation of my headquarters and invite, moreover, I ask, all democratic forces to delegate to it, if not representatives, then observers. I am open to consultations with all political forces.
In the very near future, fundraising and volunteer teams will be formed, and a campaign website will be opened. We promise that the work will be completely transparent for citizens and observers, open to all media, Russian and foreign.
The most important thing now is to collect signatures for the nomination. The most difficult task is to overcome this artificial barrier, built on the imperfection of citizens' registration data, the bias of regional and federal authorities, and the bias of election commissions.
I begin this work in conditions of lack of time and resources, well aware of the entire burden of the upcoming process. It seems even stranger to me that the main “system” candidates have not yet started it, obviously counting on administrative resources and falsifications.
They say that politics is the art of the possible; in our world turned inside out, we will have to check whether it is possible to engage in politics or whether all paths for this are artificially and skillfully blocked. This check is important not only and not so much for me, it is important for other candidates, but moreover, for all citizens of Russia. And for its future citizens.
I ask you for help. I hope and count on her.
Your Ksenia Sobchak - “Against everyone.”
How Sobchak went from TV star to politician
Interpress / TASS
Alexander Nikolaev / Interpress / TASS
Svetlana Sokolova / TASS
Still from the film
Korobeinikov Dmitry / PhotoXPress
Grigory Sysoev / TASS
Nilov Vladimir / PhotoXPress
Anna Shevelyova / AP
Artova Maria / PhotoXPress
Ilya Pitalev / RIA Novosti
Dmitry Astakhov / RIA Novosti
Denis Grishkin / Vedomosti